9 Comments
User's avatar
dkskalp's avatar

Another crucial water conflict is Afghanistan which is upstream state controlling tributaries of indus and helmud rivers which flow to Pakistan and Iran.

Should any attempt be made to divert flows we could see decades of conflicts

The Periphery's avatar

To be honest, that case was on the original list of cases to cover but length started to become an issue…

The Quiet Cartographer's avatar

What stayed with me is how the piece shifts the frame from scarcity to control. It also raises a quieter point that feels important. Most of these tensions are not triggered by absolute shortage, but by asymmetry. Who sits upstream, who controls storage, who can delay or divert flow. That is where friction accumulates long before crisis becomes visible.

It makes me wonder whether the next phase of this story is less about conflict events and more about slow leverage. Treaties, dams, data, and seasonal timing shaping outcomes in ways that rarely get framed as conflict, even when the impact is just as decisive. I've been observing that for the past year in certain regions.

The Periphery's avatar

You have hit the nail on the head, especially regarding the slow leverage. Dams, and the tension are them being built was a whole subsection I wanted to have in the piece, but once again length became an issue.

The Quiet Cartographer's avatar

I hear you. The struggle on length is real! :)

Georgi V. Georgiev's avatar

Simple. If they have no water, let them drink tea 👍

Jan Schmucker's avatar

Strong piece…Especially, the way you connect localized resource pressures to broader geopolitical dynamics.

It reinforces the idea that scarcity doesn’t just create tension, but gradually reshapes regional power structures and dependencies.

The Periphery's avatar

Thank you! I had a feeling you might pick up on that :)

Jan Schmucker's avatar

Sure (: I find that link between local pressures and broader structural shifts particularly compelling.